CMI Exam Review: World Poverty

Relacionar Grupos

Four world poverty authors: Hardin, Arthur, Pogge, and Singer x2 (I've separated Singer's views into two separate categories, in accordance with his two articles).

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Crear copia

cmi final exam review

philosophy

world poverty review

70 veces realizada

Creada por

Kristen Ekstrom

Estados Unidos

Top 10 resultados

Todavía no hay resultados para este juego. ¡Sé el primero en aparecer en el ranking!

Inicia sesión

para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Crear relacionar grupos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto


CMI Exam Review: World PovertyVersión en línea Four world poverty authors: Hardin, Arthur, Pogge, and Singer x2 (I've separated Singer's views into two separate categories, in accordance with his two articles). por Kristen Ekstrom 1 Hardin 2 Singer (1st Article) 3 Arthur 4 Pogge 5 Singer (2nd Article) It is immoral to gamble with human life. Richer nations shouldn't help poor countries because it will just worsen the problem. It is better to ensure the certain safety of a group than to risk the group's safety in order to help more people. The Unrestricted Moral Principle says that we must always help someone in need, unless helping them would cause a similar harm to oneself. The Restricted Moral Principle says that we must help someone in need if we don't have to sacrifice anything of moral significance in the process. We don't need an explicit definition of moral significance; people can define it for themselves. We cannot be obligated to give away any of our time, money, or possessions that we acquired fairly. Our entitlements, such as rights and deserts, outweigh our obligations to help other people. Singer is way too optimistic about humanity. Morality is only useful to the degree that humans can & will actually adhere to it. Hardin's claim that aiding poor nations will only increase their problems and worsen the state of things is wrong. Giving resources to poor nations will actually result in a decrease in the population. Arthur's reliance on the concept of the affluents' entitlement to their resources is misguided. Looking at history and the present, we can see that much of the affluent did not acquire their cushy lives fairly. Motivation does not draw a moral difference between actively killing and letting die. Outcomes do not draw a moral difference between actively killing and letting die. The victim of wrongdoing does not have to be identifiable for the wrongdoing to be wrong. There is no moral difference between shooting a poor person and failing to contribute money or resources to a charitable cause. We are all murderers.

CMI Exam Review: World PovertyVersión en línea

Four world poverty authors: Hardin, Arthur, Pogge, and Singer x2 (I've separated Singer's views into two separate categories, in accordance with his two articles).

por Kristen Ekstrom

Hardin

Singer (1st Article)

Arthur

Pogge

Singer (2nd Article)

It is immoral to gamble with human life.

Richer nations shouldn't help poor countries because it will just worsen the problem.

It is better to ensure the certain safety of a group than to risk the group's safety in order to help more people.

The Unrestricted Moral Principle says that we must always help someone in need, unless helping them would cause a similar harm to oneself.

The Restricted Moral Principle says that we must help someone in need if we don't have to sacrifice anything of moral significance in the process.

We don't need an explicit definition of moral significance; people can define it for themselves.

We cannot be obligated to give away any of our time, money, or possessions that we acquired fairly.

Our entitlements, such as rights and deserts, outweigh our obligations to help other people.

Singer is way too optimistic about humanity.

Morality is only useful to the degree that humans can & will actually adhere to it.

Hardin's claim that aiding poor nations will only increase their problems and worsen the state of things is wrong.

Giving resources to poor nations will actually result in a decrease in the population.

Arthur's reliance on the concept of the affluents' entitlement to their resources is misguided.

Looking at history and the present, we can see that much of the affluent did not acquire their cushy lives fairly.

Motivation does not draw a moral difference between actively killing and letting die.

Outcomes do not draw a moral difference between actively killing and letting die.

The victim of wrongdoing does not have to be identifiable for the wrongdoing to be wrong.

There is no moral difference between shooting a poor person and failing to contribute money or resources to a charitable cause.

We are all murderers.

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

CMI Exam Review: World Poverty

Relacionar Grupos

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Creada por

Top 10 resultados

Top juegos

Relacionar Grupos

Diptongos e hiatos

Relacionar Grupos

ANIMALES VERTEBRADOS E INVERTEBRADOS

Relacionar Grupos

Marcas de coches y países

Relacionar Grupos

adivina el equipo del jugador

Relacionar Grupos

RECURSOS LITERARIOS

CMI Exam Review: World PovertyVersión en línea

por Kristen Ekstrom

Hardin

Singer (1st Article)

Arthur

Pogge

Singer (2nd Article)