Research Detectives: Source Evaluation

Froggy Jumps

Jugadas 1 %Acierto 0 Tiempo medio 00:12

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

Identify suitable sources for qualitative research

Creada por

Angel Grace Indino

Filipinas

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

#	Jugador	Acierto	tiempo
1	Angel Grace Indino 7 de Agosto de 2026	% 0	00:12

¿Quieres aparecer en el Top 10 de este juego? Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto


Froggy Jumps Research Detectives: Source EvaluationVersión en línea Identify suitable sources for qualitative research por Angel Grace Indino 1 Source A (peer‑reviewed article, 2024) about Academic Stress among seniors: Is this generally appropriate for qualitative research on lived experiences? a Use it b Don't use it c Maybe 2 Source B: A Facebook post sharing a personal opinion. Is this source appropriate for a qualitative review on student stress? a Use it b Maybe c Don't use it 3 Source C: A personal blog describing a student's daily experiences. Could this be used with caution for qualitative insights? a Use it b Don't use it c Maybe 4 Source D: A master's thesis on Coping Mechanisms of Senior High School Students. Should this be used as a scholarly source in reviews? a Maybe b Don't use it c Use it 5 What makes a source appropriate for research? a Reliability, relevance, and credibility b Only popularity c Low effort and bias 6 Should every source found on the internet be included in the Review of Related Literature? Why or why not? a Yes, include all online sources b Only include peer‑reviewed sources c No, assess credibility and relevance first 7 Which of these is a reason to distrust a source? a Open access for transparency b Clear abstract and references c Lack of author credentials or data verification 8 Which source type is generally strongest for qualitative themes about lived experiences? a Personal social media post b Peer‑reviewed scholarly article c Anonymous blog 9 Can a master’s thesis be considered credible evidence for a literature review? a Only if it’s recent b Yes, if well‑documented and peer‑reviewed elsewhere c No, never 10 If a source has strong methodology but outdated data, how should it be treated? a Ignore the methodology b Use with caution and note date limitations c Always exclude it

Froggy Jumps

Research Detectives: Source EvaluationVersión en línea

Identify suitable sources for qualitative research

por Angel Grace Indino

Source A (peer‑reviewed article, 2024) about Academic Stress among seniors: Is this generally appropriate for qualitative research on lived experiences?

Use it

Don't use it

Maybe

Source B: A Facebook post sharing a personal opinion. Is this source appropriate for a qualitative review on student stress?

Use it

Maybe

Don't use it

Source C: A personal blog describing a student's daily experiences. Could this be used with caution for qualitative insights?

Use it

Don't use it

Maybe

Source D: A master's thesis on Coping Mechanisms of Senior High School Students. Should this be used as a scholarly source in reviews?

Maybe

Don't use it

Use it

What makes a source appropriate for research?

Reliability, relevance, and credibility

Only popularity

Low effort and bias

Should every source found on the internet be included in the Review of Related Literature? Why or why not?

Yes, include all online sources

Only include peer‑reviewed sources

No, assess credibility and relevance first

Which of these is a reason to distrust a source?

Open access for transparency

Clear abstract and references

Lack of author credentials or data verification

Which source type is generally strongest for qualitative themes about lived experiences?

Personal social media post

Peer‑reviewed scholarly article

Anonymous blog

Can a master’s thesis be considered credible evidence for a literature review?

Only if it’s recent

Yes, if well‑documented and peer‑reviewed elsewhere

No, never

If a source has strong methodology but outdated data, how should it be treated?

Ignore the methodology

Use with caution and note date limitations

Always exclude it

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

Research Detectives: Source Evaluation

Froggy Jumps

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Froggy Jumps

OPEN UP 6 UNIT 1 VOCABULARY

Froggy Jumps

Salva a la Ranita

Froggy Jumps

El valle de los lobos

Froggy Jumps

Sabiduría animal

Froggy Jumps

Quiz de Culpa mía película

Froggy Jumps

Research Detectives: Source EvaluationVersión en línea

por Angel Grace Indino

Source A (peer‑reviewed article, 2024) about Academic Stress among seniors: Is this generally appropriate for qualitative research on lived experiences?

Source B: A Facebook post sharing a personal opinion. Is this source appropriate for a qualitative review on student stress?

Source C: A personal blog describing a student's daily experiences. Could this be used with caution for qualitative insights?

Source D: A master's thesis on Coping Mechanisms of Senior High School Students. Should this be used as a scholarly source in reviews?

What makes a source appropriate for research?

Should every source found on the internet be included in the Review of Related Literature? Why or why not?

Which of these is a reason to distrust a source?

Which source type is generally strongest for qualitative themes about lived experiences?

Can a master’s thesis be considered credible evidence for a literature review?

If a source has strong methodology but outdated data, how should it be treated?

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%