Justice in Context

Froggy Jumps

Jugadas 1

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

This short decision-making game explores what life and justice could look like in different moments in Canadian history. You will be presented with realistic situations inspired by experiences of women facing dangerous and violent relationships. For each question, choose the option that best reflects what you think could happen or what you believe is most realistic.

The purpose of this game is not to find a “right answer,” but to highlight how laws, social attitudes, and understandings of safety have changed over time in Canada. Your choices will help introduce the ideas behind historical cases like Angelina Napolitano and Angelique Lavallee, and how they connect to the development of self-defence law

Creada por

Wendy

Canadá

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

Todavía no hay resultados para este juego. ¡Sé el primero en aparecer en el ranking! Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto


Froggy Jumps Justice in ContextVersión en línea This short decision-making game explores what life and justice could look like in different moments in Canadian history. You will be presented with realistic situations inspired by experiences of women facing dangerous and violent relationships. For each question, choose the option that best reflects what you think could happen or what you believe is most realistic. The purpose of this game is not to find a “right answer,” but to highlight how laws, social attitudes, and understandings of safety have changed over time in Canada. Your choices will help introduce the ideas behind historical cases like Angelina Napolitano and Angelique Lavallee, and how they connect to the development of self-defence law por Wendy 1 You have experienced repeated violence in your home over time. When you think about self-defence, what matters most legally (based on 1911 laws)? a The full history of what happened b Only what is happening at that exact moment c Your emotions and fear 2 In the Napolitano case, why was past abuse not considered important in court? a It was not proven b The law did not recognize it as relevant c The jury ignored it 3 In early 1900s Canada, domestic violence was mostly seen as: a A public crime b A private family issue c A police enmergency 4 In the Lavallee case, what was introduced into court for the first time? a Physical evidence only b Expert psychological testimony c Eyewitness video footage 5 What did “battered woman syndrome” help explain in court? a Why someone might stay in a relationship b Why life threatening can exist even without immediate danger c Why crimes happen randomly 6 What is the biggest difference between Napolitano’s trial and Lavallee’s case? a The type of weapon used b The legal system understood context in 1990 c The location of the trials 7 Today in Canada, self-defence law considers: a The full context, including history and relationship b Only police reports c Only the final moment of the incident 8 What changed Napolitano's sentence later? a New evidence in court b A new law was passed immediately c Public petitions and public pressure

Froggy Jumps

Justice in ContextVersión en línea

This short decision-making game explores what life and justice could look like in different moments in Canadian history. You will be presented with realistic situations inspired by experiences of women facing dangerous and violent relationships. For each question, choose the option that best reflects what you think could happen or what you believe is most realistic. The purpose of this game is not to find a “right answer,” but to highlight how laws, social attitudes, and understandings of safety have changed over time in Canada. Your choices will help introduce the ideas behind historical cases like Angelina Napolitano and Angelique Lavallee, and how they connect to the development of self-defence law

por Wendy

You have experienced repeated violence in your home over time. When you think about self-defence, what matters most legally (based on 1911 laws)?

The full history of what happened

Only what is happening at that exact moment

Your emotions and fear

In the Napolitano case, why was past abuse not considered important in court?

It was not proven

The law did not recognize it as relevant

The jury ignored it

In early 1900s Canada, domestic violence was mostly seen as:

A public crime

A private family issue

A police enmergency

In the Lavallee case, what was introduced into court for the first time?

Physical evidence only

Expert psychological testimony

Eyewitness video footage

What did “battered woman syndrome” help explain in court?

Why someone might stay in a relationship

Why life threatening can exist even without immediate danger

Why crimes happen randomly

What is the biggest difference between Napolitano’s trial and Lavallee’s case?

The type of weapon used

The legal system understood context in 1990

The location of the trials

Today in Canada, self-defence law considers:

The full context, including history and relationship

Only police reports

Only the final moment of the incident

What changed Napolitano's sentence later?

New evidence in court

A new law was passed immediately

Public petitions and public pressure

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

Justice in Context

Froggy Jumps

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Froggy Jumps

Sabiduría animal

Froggy Jumps

Salva a la Ranita

Froggy Jumps

Quiz de Culpa mía película

Froggy Jumps

OPEN UP 6 UNIT 1 VOCABULARY

Froggy Jumps

El valle de los lobos

Froggy Jumps

Justice in ContextVersión en línea

por Wendy

You have experienced repeated violence in your home over time. When you think about self-defence, what matters most legally (based on 1911 laws)?

In the Napolitano case, why was past abuse not considered important in court?

In early 1900s Canada, domestic violence was mostly seen as:

In the Lavallee case, what was introduced into court for the first time?

What did “battered woman syndrome” help explain in court?

What is the biggest difference between Napolitano’s trial and Lavallee’s case?

Today in Canada, self-defence law considers:

What changed Napolitano's sentence later?

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%