Crear
Descargar
Obtener Plan Académico
Compartir juego
Froggy Jumps
Froggy Jumps

Reading software

Intégralo en tu plataforma

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.
Descargar
Has superado el número máximo de juegos que puedes integrar en Google Classroom con tu Plan actual.

Para integrar tantos juegos como quieras en Google Classroom, necesitas un Plan Académico o un Plan Comercial.

Has superado el número máximo de juegos que puedes integrar en Microsoft Teams con tu Plan actual.

Para integrar tantos juegos como quieras en Microsoft Teams, necesitas un Plan Académico o un Plan Comercial.

La descarga de juegos es una característica exclusiva para usuarios con un Plan Académico o un Plan Comercial.

Obtén ahora tu Plan Académico o Comercial y comienza a integrar tus juegos en tu LMS, web o blog.

Si lo deseas, puedes descargar un juego de prueba aquí y probar su integración:

Reading software

Froggy Jumps

Jugadas 1

Sobre esta actividad

Reading software is as it is because of what it has to do – A systemic functional approach to developing and evaluating digital materials
Chapter 6 by Duriya Aziz Singapore Wala

Creada por

Uzbekistán

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos
Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Top juegos

%
Anónimo
Anónimo
%
%
%
Has superado el número máximo de juegos que puedes imprimir con tu Plan actual.

Para imprimir tantos juegos como quieras, necesitas un Plan Académico o un Plan Comercial.

Imprime tu juego
Reading software
 

Froggy Jumps

Reading softwareVersión en línea

Reading software is as it is because of what it has to do – A systemic functional approach to developing and evaluating digital materials Chapter 6 by Duriya Aziz Singapore Wala

por Alina K
1

What does the chapter argue Covid-19 effectively ended the debate about?

2

In the text, “educational software” is best defined as:

3

Compared to a traditional coursebook, educational software is described as:

4

User Experience (UX) is defined in the chapter as:

5

User Interface (UI) refers to:

6

Instructional Design (ID) is described as:

7

According to the chapter, UX and UI are important aspects of ID in educational software because they:

8

Which set lists the three “digitality” capabilities of educational software mentioned in the text?

9

Tomlinson & Masuhara are cited as warning that digital choice can sometimes lead to:

10

Why do Tomlinson & Masuhara emphasize careful planning of interventions in digital materials?

11

Which is named as a widely accepted step in software development involving users/teachers?

12

In the chapter’s SFL-based view, educational software (like coursebooks) is analyzed through three metafunctions:

13

In reading software, the ideational metafunction mainly relates to:

14

Interpersonal meaning in reading software is mainly realized through:

15

The chapter suggests interpersonal questions like “Does the software tell the learner what to do or allow choice?” because it concerns:

16

Textual metafunction is described as meaning that:

17

For reading software, the textual metafunction includes helping the user know:

18

The chapter describes the use of Literacy Pro as “episodic,” meaning:

19

Literacy Pro is reported as being used in:

20

Which best matches the “typical schematic structure” of Literacy Pro use given in the chapter?

21

The Literacy Pro test is described as:

22

After receiving the reading test result, students are invited to:

23

In the chapter, the “narratorial voice” of software has extra roles compared to a coursebook narrator because it must:

¿Seguro que quieres abandonar la página?

Si sales, perderás la partida en curso.