Negligence Test AQA A-level Law

Froggy Jumps

Jugadas 1

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

Full test for negligence according to AQA A-level law specification

Creada por

Jessica Paddock

Reino Unido

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

#	Jugador	Acierto	tiempo
1	Jessica Paddock 28 de Mayo de 2025	% 100	00:49

¿Quieres aparecer en el Top 10 de este juego? Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto

Quiz de Culpa mía película

Yamila Chavez

Argentina

(174)

Demuestra cuánto sabes sobre la película Culpa mía con este divertido quiz.
OPEN UP 6 UNIT 1 VOCABULARY

karen blixen

España

(101)

Repasamos el vocabulario de la unidad
El valle de los lobos

Marcos Signes

España

(109)

20 preguntas de este maravilloso libro
Sabiduría animal

Educaplay Educational Resources

España

(15458)

Conviértete en un genio del Reino Animal
Salva a la Ranita

Melanie Rodriguez

Estados Unidos

(338)

Contesta las siguientes multiplicaciones correctamente para salvar a la ranita y evitar que caiga al agua, mucha suerte!

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%

Imprime tu juego

Negligence Test AQA A-level Law


Froggy Jumps Negligence Test AQA A-level LawVersión en línea Full test for negligence according to AQA A-level law specification por Jessica Paddock 1 For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour (________ v ________). a Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Ltd b Donaghue v Stevenson c Kent v Griffiths 2 Duty of care- pre-existing precedent (________) or novel situation (______ v _______). a (Robinson), (Caparo v Dickman) b (Osman v Ferguson), (Paris v Stepney) c (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management), (Nettleship v Weston) 3 There must be reasonably foreseeable harm (____ v _________). a Smith v Leech Brain & Co. b Kent v Griffiths c The Wagon Mound 4 Proximity through time, space or relationship (_____ v ________). a Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee b McFarlane v Tayside c Osman v Ferguson 5 Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (_________ v _______). a McFarlane v Tayside b (Knightly v Johns) c (Bolton v Stone) 6 Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_____ v __________ __________ ___). a Paris v Stepney b Nettleship v Weston c Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Ltd 7 Degree of risk (______ v _____). a Bolton v Stone b Paris v Stepney c Jolley v Sutton LBC 8 Practicability of preventative actions (_____ v _______) a Mullins v Richards b Paris v Stepney c Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee 9 Standard of children (_______ v ________) a Mullins v Richards b Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee c Wiltshire v Essex 10 Standard of experts (_____ v _____ ________ _________). a Knightly v Johns b The Wagon Mound c Bolam v Friern Hospital management 11 Standard of learners (_________ v ______). a Smith v Leech Brain & Co b Nettleship v Weston c Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee 12 Factual (_______ v _______ and __________ ________ __________ _________) a Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee b The Wagon Mound c Smith v Leech Brain & Co 13 Legal causation- remoteness (___ _____ _____) and reasonable foreseeability (______ v ______ ___) a (Knightly v Johns), (Smith v Leech Brain & Co.) b (The Wagon Mound), (Smith v Leech Brain & Co.) c (The Wagon Mound), (Jolley v Sutton LBC) 14 Multiple causes (__________ v _____) a Wiltshire v Essex b Knightly v Johns c Smith v Leech Brain & Co 15 Intervening acts (________ v _____) a Wiltshire v Essex b Nettleship v Weston c Knightly v Johns 16 Thin skull rule (_____ v _____ _____ & __.) a Jolley v Sutton LBC b Smith v Leech Brain & Co c Bolton v Stone

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

Negligence Test AQA A-level Law

Froggy Jumps

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Froggy Jumps

Quiz de Culpa mía película

Froggy Jumps

OPEN UP 6 UNIT 1 VOCABULARY

Froggy Jumps

El valle de los lobos

Froggy Jumps

Sabiduría animal

Froggy Jumps

Salva a la Ranita

Froggy Jumps

Negligence Test AQA A-level LawVersión en línea

por Jessica Paddock

For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour ( v ).

Duty of care- pre-existing precedent () or novel situation ( v _).

There must be reasonably foreseeable harm ( v _____).

Proximity through time, space or relationship (_ v ____).

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (___ v _).

Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_ v __ _).

Degree of risk (__ v _).

Practicability of preventative actions (_ v ___)

Standard of children (_ v __)

Standard of experts (___ v _ ___).

Standard of learners (___ v ).

Factual (___ v _ and ___)

Legal causation- remoteness (_ _ _) and reasonable foreseeability ( v _)

Multiple causes (______ v _)

Intervening acts (____ v _)

Thin skull rule (___ v _ _ & .)

Negligence Test AQA A-level Law

Froggy Jumps

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Froggy Jumps

Quiz de Culpa mía película

Froggy Jumps

OPEN UP 6 UNIT 1 VOCABULARY

Froggy Jumps

El valle de los lobos

Froggy Jumps

Sabiduría animal

Froggy Jumps

Salva a la Ranita

Froggy Jumps

Negligence Test AQA A-level LawVersión en línea

por Jessica Paddock

For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour (________ v ________).

Duty of care- pre-existing precedent (________) or novel situation (______ v _______).

There must be reasonably foreseeable harm (____ v _________).

Proximity through time, space or relationship (_____ v ________).

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (_________ v _______).

Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_____ v __________ __________ ___).

Degree of risk (______ v _____).

Practicability of preventative actions (_____ v _______)

Standard of children (_______ v ________)

Standard of experts (_____ v _____ ________ _________).

Standard of learners (_________ v ______).

Factual (_______ v _______ and __________ ________ __________ _________)

Legal causation- remoteness (___ _____ _____) and reasonable foreseeability (______ v ______ ___)

Multiple causes (__________ v _____)

Intervening acts (________ v _____)

Thin skull rule (_____ v _____ _____ & __.)

For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour ( v ).

Duty of care- pre-existing precedent () or novel situation ( v _).

There must be reasonably foreseeable harm ( v _____).

Proximity through time, space or relationship (_ v ____).

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (___ v _).

Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_ v __ _).

Degree of risk (__ v _).

Practicability of preventative actions (_ v ___)

Standard of children (_ v __)

Standard of experts (___ v _ ___).

Standard of learners (___ v ).

Factual (___ v _ and ___)

Legal causation- remoteness (_ _ _) and reasonable foreseeability ( v _)

Multiple causes (______ v _)

Intervening acts (____ v _)

Thin skull rule (___ v _ _ & .)