Relacionar Columnas Social implcations of stuides Versión en línea fasfsakfjsakfjslakf por Rebecca Humphreys 1 THE RESEARCH HAS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS- HOW MUCH COULD IT SAVE THE UK ECONOMY BY IMPROVING THE SYSTEMS? ££££££££££££££££££££ 2 WHAT HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF PEOPLES UNDERSTANDING OF INACCURATE EWT? 3 DECIEVED PARTICIPANTS 4 PARTICIPANTS COULD NOT GIVE FULL CONSENT, SO WHAT DID THEY GIVE? 5 WHY MIGHT THE STUDY LACK VALIDITY? 6 HOW WAS DECEPTION JUSTIFIED ? 7 THE RESEARCH HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE DANGERS OF EWT ,HOW? 8 HOW HAS LOFTUS AND PALMER HELPED WITH IMPROVING SAFEGUARDS IN THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM? 9 CAUSED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT AWARE OF THE FULL AIMS OF THE STUDY E.G. ASSESSING THE USE OF LEADING QUESTIONS ONF ACCURACY OF RECALL. THEY GAVE PRESUMPTIVE CONSENT - 7.7 % OF THE UKS GDP ON RETRIALS!!! THERE WAS ONLY MILD DECEPTION WITH LIMITED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM. DONE TO AVOID DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPROVE THE I VALIDITY OF THE STUDY. Watched a video of a film of a car accident .