DAY 2 QUIZ

Test

Jugadas 1 %Acierto 0 Tiempo medio 00:07

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

CRVS 101 and 201 TRAINING

Creada por

Jerson Batan

Filipinas

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

#	Jugador	Acierto	tiempo
1	Jerson Batan 7 de Septiembre de 2026	% 0	00:07

¿Quieres aparecer en el Top 10 de este juego? Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto

Brawl stars preguntas

Carlos Andrés Prieto Rodríguez

Colombia

(164)

Completa todas las preguntas
Tipos de sintagmas (II)

idoia rubio

España

(945)

Actividades interactivas para reconocer los distintos tipos de sintagmas
Cultura general española

Ernest Serret

España

(100)

Responde las siguientes preguntas
Verbos irregulares en Inglés

Hélmer González Serrano

Colombia

(312)

Se presentan 10 preguntas, cada una con 4 opciones de respuesta. Seleccione la que considere correcta.
cuanto sabes de Futbol

hugo estay

Chile

(318)

este test esta basado en las diapositivas que pudimos ver con anterioridad, consta de 10 preguntas las cuales tienen alternativas para poder resolverlas.

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%

Imprime tu juego

DAY 2 QUIZ


DAY 2 QUIZVersión en línea CRVS 101 and 201 TRAINING por Jerson Batan 1 An audit review identifies a discrepancy in a transaction. The employee's explanation appears reasonable, but system logs show activity inconsistent with the explanation. a Give greater weight to the employee's explanation because it provides context that system records may not capture. b Treat the system logs as conclusive evidence because electronic records are more reliable than statements. c Examine both sources and obtain additional evidence before reaching a conclusion. d Presume that the discrepancy resulted from unauthorized activity until the employee proves otherwise. 2 A senior official instructs an employee to skip a verification procedure for a transaction involving an important stakeholder. The official states that the transaction is legitimate and that the verification can be completed later. What is the strongest fraud-management response? a Follow the instruction because the official assumes responsibility for the decision. b Complete the transaction but document that the verification was waived by management. c Seek confirmation through the prescribed authority and ensure that any exception is properly authorized and documented. d Refuse the transaction immediately and report the official for suspected fraud. 3 An employee has access to sensitive information, handles high-value transactions, and works with minimal supervision. No irregularity has been identified. Which conclusion is most appropriate? a The employee presents a high fraud risk and should therefore be investigated. b The employee's access represents an inherent fraud risk that should be addressed through appropriate controls. c The employee should be reassigned because lack of supervision indicates probable misconduct. d The absence of an identified irregularity means there is no meaningful fraud risk. 4 Due to staffing limitations, one employee currently performs transaction preparation and recording. Management proposes that the employee's supervisor review a monthly summary instead of implementing separate transaction-level review. Which statement is most accurate? a Monthly supervisory review completely compensates for the lack of segregation of duties. b The arrangement is acceptable because the employee and supervisor are in different positions. c The compensating control may reduce risk, but its effectiveness depends on whether the review is sufficiently independent, timely, detailed, and documented. d Segregation of duties is unnecessary when employees have worked in the office for many years. 5 Two employees have access to different stages of a transaction. An irregularity is discovered that could not have been completed by either employee acting alone. What should this finding prompt management to consider? a Whether the system malfunctioned, since two employees could not have independently caused the irregularity. b Whether the existing controls are sufficient to detect coordinated actions between employees. c Whether both employees should automatically be considered responsible. d Whether access privileges should be removed from all employees.

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

DAY 2 QUIZ

Test

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Test

Brawl stars preguntas

Test

Tipos de sintagmas (II)

Test

Cultura general española

Test

Verbos irregulares en Inglés

Test

cuanto sabes de Futbol

DAY 2 QUIZVersión en línea

por Jerson Batan

An audit review identifies a discrepancy in a transaction. The employee's explanation appears reasonable, but system logs show activity inconsistent with the explanation.

A senior official instructs an employee to skip a verification procedure for a transaction involving an important stakeholder. The official states that the transaction is legitimate and that the verification can be completed later. What is the strongest fraud-management response?

An employee has access to sensitive information, handles high-value transactions, and works with minimal supervision. No irregularity has been identified. Which conclusion is most appropriate?

Due to staffing limitations, one employee currently performs transaction preparation and recording. Management proposes that the employee's supervisor review a monthly summary instead of implementing separate transaction-level review. Which statement is most accurate?

Two employees have access to different stages of a transaction. An irregularity is discovered that could not have been completed by either employee acting alone. What should this finding prompt management to consider?