Relacionar Columnas Text Structures and Language Techniques - MatchingVersión en línea Match terms with their definitions. por Taylor Minor 1 Loaded Words 2 Third Person 3 Enumeration Order 4 Problem and Solution 5 Spatial Order 6 Chronological Order 7 Order of Importance 8 Organizational Structure 9 Connotation 10 Point of View 11 Generalization 12 Summary 13 Sequential Order 14 Main Idea 15 Figurative Language 16 Second Person 17 First Person 18 Third-Person Omniscient 19 Third-Person Limited 20 Signal Words 21 Compare and Contrast 22 Pronoun 23 Transition Words 24 Cause and Effect Organizing information as a list of points, reasons, examples, or details. A point of view using I, me, we, or us. The narrator is part of the story. Language that goes beyond literal meaning to create imagery, comparison, emphasis, or effect. Organizing events by the order in which they happened in time. A broad statement or conclusion about a group, topic, or category based on examples or evidence. A narrator who knows the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters. Organizing steps or events in the order they should occur. The feelings, associations, or implied meanings connected to a word. A structure that presents an issue and explains one or more ways to solve it. Words or phrases that help readers identify how ideas are connected. Examples: because, however, first, finally, similarly. The perspective from which a story or text is told. A brief retelling of the most important ideas and events without unnecessary details. The most important point or central message of a text or section. Organizing details by location, position, or physical arrangement. The way an author arranges ideas in a text. A point of view using you. It directly addresses the reader. A word that takes the place of a noun, such as he, she, it, they, or we. A structure that examines similarities and differences between two or more things. A narrator who follows the thoughts and feelings of one main character. Organizing ideas from least to most important, or most to least important. Strongly emotional words chosen to influence how an audience feels about a topic. Words or phrases that connect ideas and guide readers through a text. A structure that explains why something happened and what happened as a result. A point of view using he, she, they, or character names. 1 Equivocation 2 Caption 3 Table of Contents 4 Red Herring Fallacy 5 Logical Fallacy 6 False Analogy / False Causation 7 Bibliography 8 False Dilemma (Either/Or) Fallacy 9 False Equivalence Fallacy 10 Ergo Propter Hoc 11 Abstract (Scientific Publication) 12 Works Cited 13 Slippery Slope Fallacy 14 Circular Reasoning Fallacy 15 Parenthetical Citation (In-Text) 16 Heading 17 Appeal to Authority Fallacy 18 Footnote 19 Post Hoc Fallacy (False Cause) 20 Preface 21 Glossary 22 Graphic Features 23 Hasty Generalization Fallacy 24 Bandwagon Fallacy 25 Graphic Organizer 26 Fallacy 27 Subheading 28 Index 29 Staw Man Fallacy 30 Ad Hominem Fallacy An alphabetical list near the end of a book that tells where specific topics appear. A list of important terms and their definitions, usually found near the end of a book. A list of the sources actually cited in a paper or project. A list of chapters or sections and the pages where they begin. Attacking a person instead of addressing that person7s argument. Claiming that one small action will automatically lead to a chain of extreme negative events. Using the claim itself as its own evidence. A title that tells what a section of text is about. Brief text that explains a photograph, chart, illustration, or other visual. Claiming something is true, good, or right because many people believe or do it. Pretending there are only two choices when other options exist. A weak comparison between things that are not alike in important ways, or an incorrect claim that one event caused another. Misrepresenting or oversimplifying someones argument so it is easier to attack. A short summary at the beginning of a research article that explains the studys purpose, methods, findings, and conclusion. Assuming that because one event happened after another, the first event caused the second. Treating someone7s opinion as proof simply because they are famous, powerful, or respected, even when they are not qualified. Treating two things as equal even though important differences exist between them. Faulty reasoning that assumes something must be true or caused by something else simply because it seems connected. Visual elements such as charts, graphs, maps, diagrams, photographs, and timelines that help explain information. Making a broad conclusion based on too little evidence or too few examples. Using a word with more than one meaning in a misleading way. A smaller heading that divides a larger section into more specific parts. A citation placed in parentheses within a sentence to show where information came from. A list of sources used or consulted during research. A note or citation placed at the bottom of a page that gives extra information or identifies a source. An introductory section, often written by the author, that explains the purpose or background of a book. A visual tool used to organize ideas, information, comparisons, or relationships. A flawed pattern of reasoning that may sound convincing but does not logically prove a claim. Introducing an unrelated issue to distract from the real argument. An error in reasoning that makes an argument weak or misleading. 1 Tone (ELA) 2 Logical Appeal / Logos 3 Audience (Rhetorical Situation) 4 Author’s Attitude 5 Emotional Appeal / Pathos 6 Author’s Purpose 7 Rhetorical Appeal The attitude or mood an author communicates through word choice and style. The reason an author creates a text, such as to inform, persuade, entertain, explain, or inspire. The specific person or group an author is trying to reach. The author’s feelings or viewpoint toward the topic or audience. A method an author uses to persuade or influence an audience. Persuasion through facts, evidence, statistics, examples, and reasoning. Persuasion through emotions such as fear, sympathy, pride, anger, hope, or guilt. 1 Desired User Image 2 Rhetorical Question 3 Argumentative Writing 4 Persuasive Writing 5 Realized User Image 6 Mode of Rhetoric 7 Argumentation Writing meant to convince an audience to believe, think, or do something. A broad way of communicating for a purpose, such as narration, description, exposition, or argumentation. The kind of person the author wants the audience to see themselves as being. Writing or speaking that makes a claim and supports it with evidence and reasoning. The identity or role the audience actually adopts or sees in themselves after responding to the text. A question asked for effect rather than because the author expects an answer. Writing that takes a position on an issue and supports that position with evidence. 1 Exposition 2 Narration 3 Criticism 4 Description 5 Informative / Explanatory Writing 6 Claim (Argumentation) 7 Thesis Statement Writing that uses details and sensory language to help readers picture a person, place, object, or experience. Writing that tells a story or explains events in sequence. Writing that explains or provides factual information about a subject. A statement that expresses a position, belief, or argument that needs support. Writing that teaches, explains, or gives information about a topic. The central claim or main argument of an essay. Analysis and evaluation of a text, work of art, idea, or performance. 1 Expert Opinion 2 Controversial 3 Testimonial 4 Claim and Refutation 5 Relevant Evidence 6 Appeal to Authority 7 Evidence (Argumentative Writing) 8 Evidence Sufficiency Likely to cause disagreement because people have strong opposing opinions about it. A statement from a person who recommends, supports, or describes personal experience with something. Evidence that directly connects to and supports the claim being made. Facts, examples, quotations, data, or details used to support a claim. A statement or judgment from someone with specialized knowledge or experience in a topic. A strategy where a writer presents an opposing claim and then explains why it is weak, incomplete, or incorrect. Whether there is enough strong evidence to fully support a claim. Using a qualified expert or trusted source to support an argument.
Encontrar equivalencias entre unidades de medida
Empareja los nombres de las 7 maravillas del mundo moderno con su imagen al atardecer