Repaso Derecho Constitucional

Test

Jugadas 0

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

Repaso examen ordinario

Creada por

Hugo Andrés Pérez Polanco

México

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

Todavía no hay resultados para este juego. ¡Sé el primero en aparecer en el ranking! Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto

cuanto sabes de Futbol

hugo estay

Chile

(330)

este test esta basado en las diapositivas que pudimos ver con anterioridad, consta de 10 preguntas las cuales tienen alternativas para poder resolverlas.
Verbos irregulares en Inglés

Hélmer González Serrano

Colombia

(319)

Se presentan 10 preguntas, cada una con 4 opciones de respuesta. Seleccione la que considere correcta.
Cultura general española

Ernest Serret

España

(102)

Responde las siguientes preguntas
Tipos de sintagmas (II)

idoia rubio

España

(947)

Actividades interactivas para reconocer los distintos tipos de sintagmas
Brawl stars preguntas

Carlos Andrés Prieto Rodríguez

Colombia

(166)

Completa todas las preguntas

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%

Imprime tu juego

Repaso Derecho Constitucional


Repaso Derecho ConstitucionalVersión en línea Repaso examen ordinario por Hugo Andrés Pérez Polanco 1 What year did the Mexican SCJN begin recognizing the binding effect of IDH Court decisions in the Radilla-Pacheco case? a 2012 b 2008 c 2010 d 2011 2 Which expediente established the obligation for Mexican authorities to protect rights under international treaties and the Constitution? a 1396/2011 b 912/2010 c 293/2011 d 489/2010 3 What is the main procedural model adopted for conventionality control in Mexico after these rulings? a control legislativo b control preventivo c control concentrado (concentrated control) d control difuso (diffuse control) ex officio 4 Which principle requires interpreting laws in light of rights recognized in the Constitution and international treaties? a Arbitraje judicial b Interpretación Restrictiva c Interpretación Conforme en Sentido Amplio d Presunción de Inocencia 5 What does Paso 3 (inaplicación de la ley) allow judges to do? a Refrain from applying a law that violates rights b Rewrite the constitution c Strike down a law completamente d Ignore international treaties 6 What is the central consequence of the Contradicción de Tesis 293/2011? a Limitations on pro persona interpretation b Unification of constitutional criteria from IDH, with pro persona orientation c Rigid hierarchy of all courts d Elimination of IDH jurisprudence 7 Which document reform in June 2011 expanded Article 1 and embraced universal human rights? a Constitutional reform of June 2011 (Article 1) b Constitutional reform of 1999 c Constitutional reform of 2015 d Constitutional reform of 2008 8 What is the status of Cort IDH rulings when Mexico was not a party, per 293/2011? a Not considered in Mexican law b Always non-binding c They are orientadores (guiding) and can be binding if pro persona d Always fully mandatory 9 Which area is restricted by the new conventionality framework in relation to military courts? a Traffic law enforcement b Tax law jurisdiction c Maritime disputes d Civil rights protections in trials—limits on military jurisdiction 10 What is a key outcome of the Radilla case for Mexico’s constitutional order? a A return to exclusive national sovereignty b A consolidated model of control of conventionality ex officio c A ban on international treaties d Displacement of IDH jurisprudence Explicación 1 The 2010 expediente 912/2010 established the binding effect and control standards. 2 Expediente 912/2010 is the Radilla-related case introducing ex officio control. 3 The model blends diffuse control with ex officio conventionality checks. 4 Paso 1 of the Radilla framework is Interpretación Conforme en Sentido Amplio. 5 Paso 3 permits inaplicación when no compliant interpretation is possible. 6 293/2011 unified criteria, emphasizing pro persona and coherence. 7 The 2011 reform broadened human rights protections under Article 1. 8 IDH rulings are binding if pro persona and harmonized with national law. 9 Conventionality requires civil rights protection; military jurisdiction is restricted in such cases. 10 Radilla catalyzed a unified ex officio conventionality framework.

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

Repaso Derecho Constitucional

Test

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Test

cuanto sabes de Futbol

Test

Verbos irregulares en Inglés

Test

Cultura general española

Test

Tipos de sintagmas (II)

Test

Brawl stars preguntas

Repaso Derecho ConstitucionalVersión en línea

por Hugo Andrés Pérez Polanco

What year did the Mexican SCJN begin recognizing the binding effect of IDH Court decisions in the Radilla-Pacheco case?

Which expediente established the obligation for Mexican authorities to protect rights under international treaties and the Constitution?

What is the main procedural model adopted for conventionality control in Mexico after these rulings?

Which principle requires interpreting laws in light of rights recognized in the Constitution and international treaties?

What does Paso 3 (inaplicación de la ley) allow judges to do?

What is the central consequence of the Contradicción de Tesis 293/2011?

Which document reform in June 2011 expanded Article 1 and embraced universal human rights?

What is the status of Cort IDH rulings when Mexico was not a party, per 293/2011?

Which area is restricted by the new conventionality framework in relation to military courts?

What is a key outcome of the Radilla case for Mexico’s constitutional order?

Explicación