Normal vs Deaf: Primary School Achievements

Sí o No

Jugadas 0

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

Comparing outcomes in young learners

Creada por

rimmi gupta

India

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

Todavía no hay resultados para este juego. ¡Sé el primero en aparecer en el ranking! Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto

Grammys a mejor canción/grabación

Educaplay Educational Resources

España

(126)

Responde si estas canciones ganaron el Grammy a Mejor canción o grabación del año (los generales, no cuentan los Grammys de categorías)
¿Es verdad?

Educaplay Educational Resources

España

(244)

Responde si las siguientes frases sobre cultura general son verdaderas o no.
OPEN UP 5 UNIT 3: THERE IS/ARE, THERE WAS, THERE WERE

karen blixen

España

(11)

Estudiamos el grammar de la Unidad
Preguntas sobre futbol para niños

Telminator Boom

España

(95)

Un juego de preguntas y respuestas para niños sobre el fútbol. Deberán responder con ✅ o ❌ a una serie de afirmaciones relacionadas con este deporte.
¿Está creado con Inteligencia Artificial?

Educaplay Educational Resources

España

(6159)

Imágenes, canciones... Ya nada es lo que parece. ¿Están hechas con IA o son reales?


Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsVersión en línea Comparing outcomes in young learners por rimmi gupta 1 The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students. Yes No 2 Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups. Yes No 3 Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education. Yes No 4 Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms. Yes No 5 Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils. Yes No 6 All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations. Yes No 7 The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science. Yes No 8 Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject. Yes No 9 Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups. Yes No 10 Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students. Yes No

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsVersión en línea

Comparing outcomes in young learners

por rimmi gupta

The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students.

Yes

Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups.

Yes

Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education.

Yes

Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms.

Yes

Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils.

Yes

All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations.

Yes

The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science.

Yes

Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject.

Yes

Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups.

Yes

Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students.

Yes

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School Achievements

Sí o No

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Sí o No

Grammys a mejor canción/grabación

Sí o No

¿Es verdad?

Sí o No

OPEN UP 5 UNIT 3: THERE IS/ARE, THERE WAS, THERE WERE

Sí o No

Preguntas sobre futbol para niños

Sí o No

¿Está creado con Inteligencia Artificial?

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsVersión en línea

por rimmi gupta

The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students.

Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups.

Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education.

Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms.

Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils.

All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations.

The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science.

Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject.

Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups.

Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students.

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%