Philosophical Concepts

Test

Jugadas 1

Crear copia

Sobre esta actividad

Philosophical Concepts

Creada por

LBoomsky Minecraft

Estados Unidos

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top 10 resultados

#	Jugador	Acierto	tiempo
1	LBoomsky Minecraft 11 de Octubre de 2025	% 88	46:19

¿Quieres aparecer en el Top 10 de este juego? Inicia sesión para identificarte.

Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos

Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Crear reto

Cultura general española

Ernest Serret

España

(100)

Responde las siguientes preguntas
Brawl stars preguntas

Carlos Andrés Prieto Rodríguez

Colombia

(165)

Completa todas las preguntas
cuanto sabes de Futbol

hugo estay

Chile

(318)

este test esta basado en las diapositivas que pudimos ver con anterioridad, consta de 10 preguntas las cuales tienen alternativas para poder resolverlas.
Verbos irregulares en Inglés

Hélmer González Serrano

Colombia

(314)

Se presentan 10 preguntas, cada una con 4 opciones de respuesta. Seleccione la que considere correcta.
Tipos de sintagmas (II)

idoia rubio

España

(945)

Actividades interactivas para reconocer los distintos tipos de sintagmas

		%
	Anónimo	%
		%
		%

Imprime tu juego

Philosophical Concepts


Philosophical ConceptsVersión en línea Philosophical Concepts por LBoomsky Minecraft 1 A set of statements where one must be true, although both cannot be true. "It is raining" and "It is not raining." a Contrary b Contradictory 2 What type of fallacy is this: "(p:) If Fiona won the lottery (x) last night, she would drive a red Ferrari (y). (p2: I saw Fiona driving a red Ferrari (y), so (c:) Fiona won the lottery (x) last night. X makes Y, yet Y doesn't have to make X, so the conclusion isn't guaranteed. a Affirming the consequent b c d 3 Knowledge dependent on empirical evidence (e.g., “the sky is blue”) a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 4 Knowledge justified independently of empirical evidence (e.g., “all bachelors are unmarried”) Could be intuitively obvious or definitionally true. a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 5 An inference to the best explanation, in other words, the reasoning that generates a hypothesis of the most plausible explanation. a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 6 A statement which is true by definition. Like "all bacholars are unmarried" Or "it is raining or it is not raining" a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 7 The scientific model where you start with a hypothesis and a set of given conditions, deduce what facts follow from them and then conduct experiments to see if those facts hold. To see if it is true or false. a hypothetico-deductive method b c d 8 The object you are being told information about, like "the (apple) is red." a Subject b Predicate c d 9 The information being stated about a subject, like "the apple is (red)." a Subject b Predicate c d 10 An idea which is not a single object, but is a concept to describe a variety of other things which are in themselves logically unproblematic Abstractions are logical constructions that dont actually exist like "the average british person" while constructions discribe things that do exist, like a chair or the internet. a Logical Constructions b Reduction c d 11 To look at how something works from a more fundamental level. Like how, we know why stuff boils at certain temperatures by looking further down at the molecular level. a Logical Constructions b Reduction c Heuristic Device d 12 Rule of logic stating that if a conditional statement (If P, then Q) is true, and its first part (the antecedent, P) is also true, then the second part (the consequent, Q) must also be true. "If it is raining, then the street is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the street is wet" a Modus ponens b Modus tollens c d 13 Rule of logic that states if a conditional statement ("if P, then Q") is true, and the consequent (Q) is false, then the antecedent (P) must also be false. It is also known as "denying the consequent" and is expressed in the structure: "If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P" If it is raining (P), then the ground is wet (Q). The ground is not wet (not Q). Therefore, it is not raining (not P) a Modus ponens b Modus tollens c d

Puedes integrar el juego en un LMS compatible con LTI 1.1 o LTI 1.3 como Canvas, Moodle, o Blackboard. De esta manera podrás guardar las puntuaciones automáticamente en el libro de calificaciones de esa plataforma.

Philosophical Concepts

Test

Sobre esta actividad

Creada por

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Top juegos

Test

Cultura general española

Test

Brawl stars preguntas

Test

cuanto sabes de Futbol

Test

Verbos irregulares en Inglés

Test

Tipos de sintagmas (II)

Philosophical ConceptsVersión en línea

por LBoomsky Minecraft

A set of statements where one must be true, although both cannot be true. "It is raining" and "It is not raining."

What type of fallacy is this: "(p:) If Fiona won the lottery (x) last night, she would drive a red Ferrari (y). (p2: I saw Fiona driving a red Ferrari (y), so (c:) Fiona won the lottery (x) last night. X makes Y, yet Y doesn't have to make X, so the conclusion isn't guaranteed.

Knowledge dependent on empirical evidence (e.g., “the sky is blue”)

Knowledge justified independently of empirical evidence (e.g., “all bachelors are unmarried”) Could be intuitively obvious or definitionally true.

An inference to the best explanation, in other words, the reasoning that generates a hypothesis of the most plausible explanation.

A statement which is true by definition. Like "all bacholars are unmarried" Or "it is raining or it is not raining"

The scientific model where you start with a hypothesis and a set of given conditions, deduce what facts follow from them and then conduct experiments to see if those facts hold. To see if it is true or false.

The object you are being told information about, like "the (apple) is red."

The information being stated about a subject, like "the apple is (red)."

To look at how something works from a more fundamental level. Like how, we know why stuff boils at certain temperatures by looking further down at the molecular level.

Rule of logic stating that if a conditional statement (If P, then Q) is true, and its first part (the antecedent, P) is also true, then the second part (the consequent, Q) must also be true. "If it is raining, then the street is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the street is wet"