Icon Crear Crear

Session 05- MitM Attacks II

Completar frases

Subject : Security and Privacy Risks in Computer & Internet Applications
Lecturer: Assoc. Prof. Dr. James Joshi
Faculty: Graduate School of Information Technology
Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

Edad recomendada: 21 años
0 veces realizada

Creada por

Tailandia

Top 10 resultados

Todavía no hay resultados para este juego. ¡Sé el primero en aparecer en el ranking! para identificarte.
Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos
Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Top juegos

  1. tiempo
    puntuacion
  1. tiempo
    puntuacion
tiempo
puntuacion
tiempo
puntuacion
 
game-icon

Completar frases

Session 05- MitM Attacks IIVersión en línea

Subject : Security and Privacy Risks in Computer & Internet Applications Lecturer: Assoc. Prof. Dr. James Joshi Faculty: Graduate School of Information Technology Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand

por Prince Parham
1

relays cryptographic authentication eavesdropping Public keys JavaScript intercept

1 . Based on the " Mitigating a Fallacy " rules :
Executing on victim = = executing an attack

2 . The man - in - the - middle attack ( often abbreviated MitM , also known as a bucket brigade attack , or sometimes Janus attack ) in cryptography and computer security is a form of active in which the attacker makes independent connections with the victims and messages between them , making them believe that they are talking directly to each other over a private connection , when in fact the entire conversation is controlled by the attacker .

3 . The attacker must be able to all messages going between the two victims and inject new ones , which is straightforward in many circumstances ( for example , an attacker within reception range of an unencrypted Wi - Fi wireless access point , can insert himself as a man - in - the - middle ) .

4 . A man - in - the - middle attack can succeed only when the attacker can impersonate each endpoint to the satisfaction of the other ? it is an attack on mutual ( or lack thereof ) . Most protocols include some form of endpoint authentication specifically to prevent MITM attacks . For example , SSL can authenticate one or both parties using a mutually trusted certification authority .

5 . Various defenses against MITM attacks use authentication techniques that are based on the key infrastructures .

6 . Stronger mutual authentication , such as :
Secret ( which are usually high information entropy secrets , and thus more secure ) , or
Passwords ( which are usually low information entropy secrets , and thus less secure ) .

educaplay suscripción