Relacionar Columnas NS2015 mix and match 3Versión en línea Week 3 por Jacqui Jane 1 Moral dogmatism 2 Moral pluralism 3 Moral distress 4 Moral relativism 5 Moral agent 6 Moral uncertainty 7 Emotional distancing 8 Self interest 9 Conflict of conscious 10 Dilemma 11 Justice 12 Agapeistic ethics Occurs when an individual is unsure whether there exists a moral/ethical dilemma or unsure which principles apply Acting according to personal gain, whilst not immoral can on occasions be selfish in its motivation. The holding of a moral belief without being willing to discuss it, or to offer any reasons to support it, or to consider any opposing viewpoint. A complex or perplexing situation involving individuals requiring an action or decision of which there is no clear, desirable or simple solution. Being in a situation where the individual’s moral values are compromised. Deeply held personal views of a health professional clash with reasoned and reasonable (health or otherwise) related decisions. A philosophy that asserts there is no global, absolute moral law that applies to all people, for all time, and in all places but espouses a qualified view in the areas of individual moral practice where personal and situational encounters supposedly dictate the correct moral position. Ethical school of thinking related to love, sympathy and caring towards others. Refers to the just and equitable distribution of benefits and burdens amongst members of society. Is the assumption there are many moral truths, not just one, and they may conflict with one another. A being who is capable of acting with reference to right and wrong. Allows the individual to separate the client into clinical and social parts so that they can ignore the dependence of the client upon the nurse in the guides of clinical objectivity