Icon Crear Crear

Evaluating Credible Sources

Sí o No

(1)
In this game, players will assess various nouns to determine whether they are considered credible sources of information. Players will respond with ✅ for credible sources and ❌ for non-credible sources. Test your knowledge and improve your ability to discern reliable information!

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

86 veces realizada

Creada por

Estados Unidos

Top 10 resultados

  1. 1
    Sarah B
    Sarah B
    00:45
    tiempo
    100
    puntuacion
  2. 2
    Selina
    Selina
    00:55
    tiempo
    100
    puntuacion
  3. 3
    Caroline
    Caroline
    01:10
    tiempo
    100
    puntuacion
  4. 4
    Ella S
    Ella S
    01:27
    tiempo
    100
    puntuacion
  5. 5
    sam
    sam
    01:30
    tiempo
    100
    puntuacion
  6. 6
    01:17
    tiempo
    98
    puntuacion
  7. 7
    Marissa
    Marissa
    01:26
    tiempo
    98
    puntuacion
  8. 8
    Abby M
    Abby M
    01:12
    tiempo
    95
    puntuacion
  9. 9
    Ellie
    Ellie
    01:26
    tiempo
    93
    puntuacion
  10. 10
    01:54
    tiempo
    93
    puntuacion
¿Quieres aparecer en el Top 10 de este juego? para identificarte.
Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos
Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Top juegos

  1. tiempo
    puntuacion
  1. tiempo
    puntuacion
tiempo
puntuacion
tiempo
puntuacion
 
game-icon

Evaluating Credible SourcesVersión en línea

In this game, players will assess various nouns to determine whether they are considered credible sources of information. Players will respond with ✅ for credible sources and ❌ for non-credible sources. Test your knowledge and improve your ability to discern reliable information!

por Clarissia Morrow
1

Random YouTube video

2

Opinion piece

3

Reputable news outlet

4

Wikipedia

5

Anonymous forum

6

Academic book

7

Unverified news site

8

Government report

9

Peer-reviewed journal

10

Personal blog

11

University website

12

Expert interview

13

Social media post

14

Professional association

15

Clickbait article

16

Research paper

17

Conspiracy theory website

18

Library database

19

Spam email

20

Nonprofit organization

21

Anonymous forum

22

Non-profit organization

23

Research paper

24

Academic book

25

Clickbait headline

26

Reputable news outlet

27

Library archive

28

Personal blog

29

Peer-reviewed journal

30

University website

31

Unverified news article

32

Conspiracy theory website

33

Opinion piece without sources

34

Expert interview

35

Commercial website

36

Social media post

37

Government report

38

Unpublished manuscript

39

Statistical database

40

Wikipedia

educaplay suscripción