Icon Crear Crear

EBP Review of Research Evidence Evaluation

Test

Test your knowledge of concepts related to research evidence evaluation.

Descarga la versión para jugar en papel

1 veces realizada

Creada por

Estados Unidos

Top 10 resultados

Todavía no hay resultados para este juego. ¡Sé el primero en aparecer en el ranking! para identificarte.
Crea tu propio juego gratis desde nuestro creador de juegos
Compite contra tus amigos para ver quien consigue la mejor puntuación en esta actividad

Top juegos

  1. tiempo
    puntuacion
  1. tiempo
    puntuacion
tiempo
puntuacion
tiempo
puntuacion
 
game-icon

EBP Review of Research Evidence EvaluationVersión en línea

Test your knowledge of concepts related to research evidence evaluation.

por Link Staff
1

Research evaluation criteria typically involve three domains quality, quantity, and

2

2.Which of the following is a rating system that is assigned to assess the validity of a study?

3

According to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), which of the following research designs provides the highest level of evidence?

4

According to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), in addition to systematic reviews and meta-analyses with consistence findings, level 1 (good quality patient-oriented evidence) can be assigned to:

5

The strength (or grade) of a recommendation for clinical practice is based on:

6

Which of the following examples is NOT representative of patient-oriented evidence?

7

According to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), level 3 evidence is assigned to a study based on:

8

A number of observational studies (level of evidence—2) suggested a cardiovascular benefit from vitamin E while two large, well-designed, randomized trials with a diverse patient population (level of evidence—1) consistently showed the opposite. The strength of recommendation against routine, long-term use of vitamin E to prevent heart disease, based on the best available evidence, should be:

9

A new drug increases the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak flow rate in patients with an acute asthma exacerbation. Data on symptom improvement is lacking. The strength of recommendation in favor of using this drug is:

10

In order to assign a level of evidence of 1 to a randomized controlled trial with primarily patient-oriented evidence, what criteria is considered in addition to blinding (if feasible) and adequacy of power (sample size) and follow-up ( 80%)? Whether:

educaplay suscripción