1
Finally, the third group (n = 130) received 10 g of protein, 8 g of
2
and 83% fewer visits due to heat
3
In addition, initial determinations of
4
The interaction of treatment effects with body mass
5
written consent was obtained for procedures to be
6
and a seven-point Likert scale that uses multiple questions to assess
7
Differences between the treatment groups for variables of health were
8
Con were selected a priori to apply post hoc t-test
9
The comparisons of Pro vs
10
no soreness—no impact on my
11
The third pair of assessments was made after the recruit's final physical fitness
12
It has been demonstrated that a linear relationship exists
13
Forty-two percent of the subjects reported a history of smoking an
14
The subjects were not informed as to which treatments were Pla, Con, or Pro and were told that each of the treatments had equal potential to produce
15
were recruited from six platoons at the Marine Corps
16
The third pair of assessments was made after the recruit's final physical
17
Before the study, the subjects reported a frequency of exercise as
18
Recruits experiencing heat exhaustion had greater body mass, lean, fat, and water
19
Elevated postexercise amino acid availability has been demonstrated to enhance the
20
so sore—I am unable to
